Universal Access To All Knowledge
Home Donate | Store | Blog | FAQ | Jobs | Volunteer Positions | Contact | Bios | Forums | Projects | Terms, Privacy, & Copyright
Search: Advanced Search
Anonymous User (login or join us)
Upload

Reply to this post | See parent post | Go Back
View Post [edit]

Poster: ducats Date: Aug 2, 2007 6:15am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: The Bridge

I got told I was incorrect in pointing out the hypocrisy of "killing" Vick last week.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Ssag Date: Aug 2, 2007 6:46am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: The Bridge

All I ask you to do was explain your remark and not leave it to the ambiguous mutual understanding. Its great to have opinions but it's another thing to actually be able to back it up and show what you are saying is true. Anybody can make blanket statements that sound correct but underneath or with further thinking it might not be right. Look no further than Karl Rove and his mastery of spinning the truth.

Like I said I do not think it's a good comparison to contrast a business ethic issue like Addias using slave labor overseas to an individual personal responsibility issue like Mike Vick torturing dogs to their death(allegedly).

They have similarities but they are not the same (both are morally unethical). You say its hypocritical for Addias or Nike to point the finger at Vick when they may or may not be doing something you don't like. Explain that and change my mind, it wouldn't be hard to do. But I won't just fall for a quick glib because it seems right.

This post was modified by Ssag on 2007-08-02 13:43:57

This post was modified by Ssag on 2007-08-02 13:46:22